Replacing a director in a company is a very important and drastic action since it directly influences the running of the company, its compliance with regulations and even its future viability. Most of the time, the founders, investors and the company secretaries will need to have a clearer understanding of how director removal works, what the law says concerning it, and whether it has to be done voluntary vs forced director removal.
This write-up clarifies the two forms of director removal under the Companies Act, 2013, their reasons, the legal processes involved and the major differences that you need to know between voluntary vs forced director removal.
What Does Director Removal Mean?
Director removal refers to the formal procedure to terminate a director’s appointment prior to the expiry of his or her term. The Companies Act provides for two main ways to do this:
- The director hands in his/her resignation.
- The company passes a resolution to remove the director, which is deemed as a compulsory or forced removal.
Regardless of the path taken, documentation is required, proper notifications are necessary, and actions of board and shareholders, as well as filings with the Registrar of Companies (ROC), are involved.
1. Voluntary Director Removal (Resignation)
A voluntary removal is when a director decides to leave the company by himself. It is the case that most often occurs in smaller and growing businesses.
Reasons for Directors Resignation
A director might opt to resign for the following reasons:
- Personal obligations or health problems
- Career change or moving away
- Disagreements within the company
- No longer participating in the company’s operations
- Their mission in the company is over
No matter what the reason is, the resignation of director must be recorded correctly.
Legal Process for Voluntary Removal
The Companies Act requires a clear and transparent process.
1: Director submits a written resignation letter
The director must provide a formal letter addressed to the Board of Directors.
2: Board meeting to take note of resignation
The Board records the resignation and authorises filing the required forms.
3: Company files Form DIR-12
This must be filed with the ROC within 30 days from the date of resignation being accepted.
4: Director files Form DIR-11 (optional for companies, mandatory for directors)
The director can also independently notify the ROC about their exit.
5: Update statutory registers and records
The company updates the register of directors and reflects the change in its records.
Effective Date of Resignation
The resignation becomes valid either on:
• The date mentioned in the resignation letter, or
• The date the company receives the resignation,
whichever is later.
2. Forced Director Removal (By Company)
Forced removal refers to a situation when a director is dismissed from their position by the company or its shareholders against their will. This process can only take place through a formal legal procedure.
When a Director Can Be Removed Without Consent
A company may remove a director in cases such as:
• Misconduct or breach of fiduciary duty
• Non-performance or absenteeism
• Loss of trust among shareholders
• Violation of company policies
• Ignoring compliance responsibilities
• Not attending Board meetings for 12 months
Even a director appointed by a general meeting can be removed, but directors appointed by the Tribunal cannot be removed by the company.
Legal Procedure for Forced Removal
The Companies Act sets out a step-by-step procedure to ensure fairness.
1: Issue a special notice
Shareholders holding at least 1% of voting power, or shares worth at least INR 5 lakh, must issue a special notice proposing the removal.
2: Board meeting to consider notice
The Board schedules a general meeting to decide on the removal.
3: Give notice to the director
The director must be given a chance to state their case in writing or orally at the meeting.
4: Hold the general meeting
Shareholders vote on the removal through an ordinary resolution.
5: File Form DIR-12
The company must inform the ROC about the removal within 30 days.
also read this blog- Essential Tax Consultancy Services in the UK for Individuals and Businesses
Director’s Right to Representation
Before removal, the director has the right to:
• Send a written representation
• Request that their representation be circulated to all shareholders
• Speak at the general meeting
This ensures the process is fair and transparent.
Voluntary vs Forced Director Removal – Key Differences
| Key Aspect | Voluntary Removal | Forced Removal |
| Initiated By | Director resigns on their own | Shareholders or Board initiate the process |
| Consent Required | Yes, from the director | No, director can be removed even without consent |
| Reason Required | Not mandatory | Usually, performance, misconduct or non-compliance |
| Right to Representation | Not applicable | Director must be given a fair chance to respond |
| Resolution Type | Board takes note | Ordinary resolution passed in the general meeting |
| Forms Filed | DIR-12 by company, DIR-11 by director | DIR-12 by the company |
| Complexity | Simple and straightforward | More formal, requires special notice and voting |
| Impact on Company | Minimal disruption | May cause internal conflict or legal scrutiny |
Common Mistakes Companies Make During Director Removal
Even companies with good intentions can make compliance mistakes, such as:
• Removing a director without proper notice
• Not recording the resignation in minutes
• Missing deadlines for filing DIR-12
• Ignoring the director’s right to representation
• Not updating statutory registers
These errors can cause penalties and compliance trouble, so the company must follow the law carefully.
How to Decide Which Path Applies to You
If you are unsure whether the situation calls for voluntary or forced removal, consider the following:
Choose voluntary removal if:
• The director is cooperating
• The exit is mutually agreed
• No dispute exists between parties
Choose forced removal if:
• The director is not responsive
• Misconduct, absenteeism or non-compliance is involved
• The Board or shareholders have lost trust
• The director refuses to step down despite issues
Whenever possible, companies prefer voluntary resignation because it avoids conflict and reduces compliance risk.
Conclusion
The removal of director is always a legal process that follows systematic steps and can be either by the director’s own choice or the other way. Knowing the difference allows firms to not only prevent quarrels but also remain within the law as per the Companies Act, 2013. The director’s voluntary removal is polite and friendly, while the forced removal is a strict and structured process that demands accuracy in every step, particularly in giving notice and conducting voting.
In the event of a wrong choice, either of the two methods could still be an advantage to the company in terms of safeguarding its interests and having a stable management.
